Quality Bicycle Products Acquires BikeFit Brand

Quality Bicycle Products announced today that it has acquired the BikeFit brand. The acquisition will expand the assortment of BikeFit products available from Q to specialty bicycle retailers and professional bike fitters, as well as strengthen Q’s portfolio of educational services for retailers. Q is now the wholesale distributor of BikeFit products and services in North America. 

“We are excited to add BikeFit to our consumer brand portfolio,” said Rich Tauer, President of Quality Bicycle Products. “As a world leader of products that make cycling more enjoyable to riders, BikeFit serves a crucial role that benefits the bicycle industry.

 ]“Q’s vision is to get every butt on a bike. If they’re not comfortable on bike, then we’ve fallen short. By acquiring BikeFit, Q expands our support of retailers and fitters with more products and resources that provide greater comfort, performance and enjoyment for all riders, whether they’re new to the sport or longtime enthusiasts.”

 Q currently stocks the most popular BikeFit products and will soon offer the complete assortment to US and Canadian partners through its four US distribution centers, with convenient just-in-time service.

Retailers and bike fitters who don’t currently have a business account with Q are encouraged to apply at https://www.qbp.com/dealers.

* * * * *

About Quality Bicycle Products

Quality Bicycle Products works to advance bike communities and our industry so everyone can win. From developing our own compelling bicycle and accessory brands, to distributing the most comprehensive portfolio of top brands in the industry, to sparking advocacy efforts that increase ridership, Q serves as a common thread that weaves together retailers, suppliers, industry partners, and riders. With distribution centers in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Colorado, Vancouver, and Toronto, Q reaches a network of more than 5,000 independent retailers. We strive to be an extraordinary business partner and employer, and we have made good on that goal for nearly 40 years. For more information about Quality Bicycle Products, visit qbp.com.

Handlebar Adjustments and Hand Position in Bike Fitting

These 5 categories of hand position and handlebar adjustments used by the best professional bike fitters on the planet.  

Many people experience discomfort in cycling specifically focuses on one of the three contact points: the hands.  While the most popular change is likely stem length or height, today we’ll talk about the changes every bike fitter should examine.

Hand positioning on a bicycle is a mix of the bar’s height, depth and width, bar rotation,  length and rise/decline of the stem, and brake type/hood and position (including the lever’s reach).  The position can be augmented by changing any of these variables.  Finding the right one for you is a level of trial and error and most likely a visit to a professional who examines all of these factors and how they contribute to your overall position.  Each contact point change on the bicycle may impact another contact point but for this specific article, we’ll examine hand position in isolation.  

General Hand Position

BikeFit Arm Angle Road Bike FittingGenerally, your hands should be placed in whatever position you most frequently ride. The most comfortable position for the majority of road and gravel bike cyclists is where the angle between the torso and the upper arm is around 90 degrees (see illustration right). You should have a slight bend in the elbows to maximize comfort and control. This bend can increase if you want to become more aerodynamic such as when time-trialing, racing, or riding into a significant headwind.

Once you’ve found your sweet spot you can begin adjusting the position. Don’t forget to move your hands around on the bars to try different positions. We also recommend testing standing on the pedals to accommodate climbing or sprinting out of the saddle.

If you ride more upright, the angle at the shoulder may be less than 90 degrees. This less than 90-degree angle applies to road bikes, touring bikes, and indoor bikes.

Comfort should be your guide when adjusting the height of the handlebars. The road bike racer typically has the top of the handlebars below the seat height. For non-racers of many disciplines, the top of the bars may be even with the saddle or even higher. 

Stem Height / Handlebar Height

The height is impacted by 2 factors:

  • # of spacers under the stem
  • Stem Angle

Headset Spacers

When you purchase a new bike, the fork is uncut which means you’ll have the option to choose to cut the fork height lower, which would accommodate fewer headset spacers.   From a bike fitting standpoint, it’s unhelpful to do this from purely aesthetic motivation until you’ve discovered proper position.  The only exception to this would be a custom bike where your measurements from a previously fit bike were used to create a custom geometry for you minus the spacers.  A small side note here is that fit changes with fitness, age, injury, and other factors.  As a result, having the ability to make adjustments with your bike is extremely helpful unless you want to continue buying bikes regularly.  If financially feasible, this is not the worst problem on the planet.  For reference, most bikes will offer about 40-60mm in spacer height.

Stem Height

An adjustable stem or sizing stem is the best way to find your ideal stem height.  A BikeFit Pro with this tool can help you test from -30 degrees to +30 degrees while also easily examining your stem length as well.

Without the use of this tool through a professional fitter or bike shop, some companies offer adjustable stems. We define an adjustable stem as having more than one axis of adjustment. There are many one-axis adjustable stems that don’t allow for adjusting the stem’s length.  From our standpoint, if you are going to invest the money into an adjustable stem (not many left on the market), you’re likely better off visiting a fitter where they’ll aid you in finding the right stem and then you’re afforded with the opportunity to purchase one (with the proper specifications) that matches your bike and style.  Comfort first; style second.

Speaking of style, many cyclists see professional bikes and want to emulate their stem length and drop.  While many of those parts may be available including some sexy looking one-piece bar and stem combos, how do you know before purchasing if the reach, drop, and length are right for your riding style, goals, distance…etc?  We are not saying that these products are not great or don’t offer advantages but style without fit is worthless.  For example, if someone purchases a -17 degree stem and “slams” their bike (removes all the spacers) but can barely survive a ride for more than an hour without dismounting to stretch negates the potential “aero” benefits of that position.  They also will potentially be forced to book an appointment with a reputable spine surgeon in a few years.   That’s not to say that no one should ride in an aggressive position.  There are some flexible, solid-core individuals who can sustain that position while remaining comfortable for hours.  Most of them are professional or aspiring racers but just because they do it, doesn’t mean you must to experience true cycling enjoyment.  In the end, we like the advice from “Big Jonny” posted on the Drunk Cyclist Blog, “Forget slamming.  Ride what your body requires.”


Stem Length

Although this may seem like a shameless self-promotion, it’s the truth.  A sizing stem is again the best possible way to efficiently test different stem lengths.  If you visit a bike shop or fitter and they are forced to remove and install a stem each time you want to try a new angle or length, how long would this take?  Removing a stem isn’t difficult per se but it is tedious.  There are multiple points to examine on a bicycle and spending half an hour trying 6 different stems may not be the best use of time.  If we can stress anything in your bike fitting journey, it’s to test positions until you find the one that’s the most comfortable for you  (hopefully in the most efficient manner).

To verify this point, we asked several bike fitters to give their expert opinion on the proper stem a couple of years ago. We began by showing them a number of different cyclists. Of the 8 fitters, we questioned, 6 of 8 failed to recommend the proper stem length the rider ultimately chose after utilizing a sizing stem. Not once did more than 2 fitters guess the desired stem for the rider.  This test was only for length—we didn’t ask about the stem’s height or angle.  Finding the right stem is challenging (and sometimes expensive) to do by yourself and is definitely an area where a BikeFit Pro can help you.  If a bicycle fitting expert recommends a stem without testing or trying a few lengths, we strongly advise you gently recommend they use a sizing stem or find another fitter.

Handlebar Reach and Drop

Handlebar reach is the distance from the center of the stem connection to the bar and the furthest point in the “drops.”  The “drop” is the distance from the highest point of the bar to the lowest point. 

The implications on fit are how the bar affects your position and comfort on the bike.  If you see a handlebar at your local bike shop with some appeal to you, it’s important to find out where it stacks up in both of these variables before you purchase.  For some, the bar upgrade is focused on the material (aluminum vs. carbon), weight or personal choice in a different shape.  The reach, drop, and shape should be comfortable and appropriate for your riding style.  

Photo Credit: Bike Gremlin

Handlebar Rotation

Historically the most frequently used method of determining the handlebar’s rotation was putting the bottom of the drop parallel to the ground or level like the photo on the left. If you walk into most bike shops today, this is what you’ll most likely observe.  This position, while aesthetically pleasing,  is usually not comfortable for most riders. The rotation of your bars is determined solely by what is comfortable, not the bar’s alignment with the earth’s surface.  Rotate your bars upward until you achieve a more neutral wrist position (this can also be achieved through hood placement).  Let comfort be your guide to fine tune as your body will guide you to the best position. This simple adjustment helps improve hand comfort and reduces numbness.

Lever or Brake Placement

Much like the rotation, the goal is a neutral wrist position.  The brake levers on both road, gravel and mountain bikes are mobile and can be adjusted to impact not only wrist position but also reach.  Mountain bikes, like any other type of bike, brake lever position is imperative when establishing a neutral wrist position.

Lever Tilt

This seemingly minuscule change significantly impacts riding comfort.  Like the myth that all handlebar drops should be parallel with the ground, levers do not need to follow the contour of the drop; they can be shifted inward or outward based on comfort.  As much as manufacturers have worked on the ergonomic designs of hoods for comfort, placement on the bar and tilt provides the most natural hand position for the individual preferences and bodies.  Over the years of fitting thousands of riders, here’s what we’ve found that seems to help most riders.

When hoods are set up in line with the handlebar, the hands are in an unnatural position.  Tilting the brake levers inward provides pain relief and increased control.

Below the unnatural position, we are forced into when conforming to untilted hoods shown without the handlebars.

Here the hands hang and move naturally.  The brake lever placement should mimic the natural inclinations of the body.

For most people, that natural position is achieved by rotating the levers/hoods inward on a road or gravel bike. 

Final Hand Position Info

Hopefully, this article provides you with some ideas on the different adjustments and hand position changes on the bike.  We should mention that these are not the only factors and implications in handlebar fitting.  Handlebar shape and width are two variables in hand position and overall comfort that should be part of your fitting process as well.  Consequently, the best possible advice from BikeFit is to not be afraid to try some out-of-the-box changes suggested in this article.  Secondly, and most importantly, setting up an appointment with a qualified BikeFit professional provides crucial advice, the ability to test many of these methods (including products), and an outside set of eyes to observe your riding with the ability to offer vital insight into the best changes for you.  In the end, fitting is a personal experience and although humans have trends, everyone is asymmetrical and unique.  If you are concerned about the expectations of a bike fit or want to learn more about bike fitting, we provide more information on our blog.

Good luck and happy fitting!

-Your BikeFit Team, Paul and Damon

Sit Bones Width Measurement and Bike Saddle Selection

How do you choose the right saddle? Bike shops, saddle manufacturers, bloggers, and cycling periodicals have relentlessly tackled this topic for years.  While there are resources that offer positive tips, there is one methodology for saddle selection that we’d like to discuss today: sit bones measurement.  Is it a good indicator of proper saddle width?  While we’d like to remain entirely unbiased, but that’s incredibly unlikely.

The Sit Bones, “Sitz Bones” Sitting Bones or Ischial Tuberosity

The Ischial Tuberosity is commonly referred to as the “sit bones,” “sitting bones,” or “sitz bones”(“sitz” literally translates to “seat” in German).  In many cases, they are measured to potentially find your optimal saddle width.  This seems, at the outset, to be logical as the bony part of the sit bones will experience undue pressure when pressed against a minuscule surface area such as a bike saddle.  The cycling industry hypothesis: if your bones are spaced further apart, you’ll require a wider saddle for a luxurious rear-cradling experience.

The Sit Bones Measurement

Many bike companies and manufacturers constructed a plethora of possibilities on how to measure your sit bones.  We even use one as a starting point on the BikeFit Edition BiSaddle Instructions.   Without purchasing anything, some companies even will send you a kit that’s similar to the home method below.  Let’s explore the home and dealer methodologies for sit bone width measurement.

The Home Measurement Methods

The Cardboard Impression

This method involves sitting upright on a piece of corrugated cardboard for a designated period of time.  After that point, you’ll mark the main impressions of the sit bones, find the center point of the two impressions, and finally measure the distance between the two points with a ruler or tape measure.

The Wet Measurement or “Damp Spot” Method

There are similar methods involving paper without the damp posterior result, but now that you feel uncomfortable, you’ve properly ingested this idea.

After measuring the sit bones distance, most companies provide either a “finder” online system on a chart where your measured sit bones width correlates to certain saddles.  Many suggest adding about 20mm, as signified by the Road Bike Bros above, which would then land you on the ideal saddle.  For example, if your sit bones measured 130mm, you add 20mm and voila, a 150mm saddle width will fit perfectly!  It’s interesting to note that the Road Bike Bro measured 110mm, added 20mm, but choose a 145mm width saddle which in his words, “provides more support and I find it more comfortable.”

Some selection tools will also incorporate riding style, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves.  Before we move on to the effectiveness, take a moment to observe the sit bone measurement methods proposed by some of the powerhouses in the cycling industry.

The Industry Methods: Giant Peanuts and Gel Pads

This is certainly not an exhaustive list but many others utilize similar methodology.  The process, though, is exactly the same as the home methods provided above.  Below is a picture of the sitting position well described in an article by www.cyclingabout.com.  The eager cyclist sits at a 90-degree spine position on a more professional looking apparatus, the sit bone impression is apparent on the device, it’s then diligently measured and the match process begins.  Width of sit bones + X (Defined as added width by manufacture) = the saddle made for you.

Sit Bones and Cycling Position

Now that we’ve properly defined the sit bones measurement, let’s discuss it.  What’s your riding position?  Cycling is one of those odd sports where the type of cycling, goals, intensity, and volume will likely affect body position and invariably, your saddle choice.  To learn more, take a look at this video from BikeFit founder and master bike fitter, Paul Swift.  If you ever have the pleasure of talking to Paul or taking one of his bike fitting courses, this is his baseline level of passion and energy.
While some commuters and leisure cyclists sit at the 90-degree position, the majority of cyclists will have some type of pelvic bend (as Paul mentioned).  Consequently, the sit bones would not be your main pressure point or measurement point for potential saddle comfort.  Take a look a the position below of three different types of cyclists.
Depending on the discipline, the pelvis is clearly in a different position but the instructions for sit bones measurement for saddle selection focus on a 90-degree spine angle.  If the majority of cyclists ride at some type of angle, what part of the pelvis takes the brunt of the pressure in different body positions?

The two diagrams above provide a much clearer picture of pelvic position and which bones receive the most pressure depending on the amount of rotation or position of the rider.  We did not quantify this to a degree of angle as this is rider dependent.  Yet, our friends at BiSaddle (image to the upper right) pointed out that the pubic Rami may be a much more common pressure point measurement vs. the sit bones.  If you are a triathlete, racer or a more “aggressive” positioned rider, measuring your sit bones for saddle width provides an improper account of what’s actually in contact with the saddle.  This does not incorporate the fact that in a more aggressive position, you’re also encountering more sensitive organs and tissue beyond the bones of the pelvis.

Industry Sit Bone Research

In 2015 the Selle Royal Group in collaboration with the German Sport University in Cologne (to make it legit) performed a study(mostly to sell saddles) to discover the optimal shape saddle considering male and female differences and rider position.  They broke this down into 3 separate studies: sit bone width, gender differences, and optimal saddle shape.  We will summarize the findings, but if you want more information about it, there was an excellent write up constructed by Total Women’s Cycling or on the Scientia site.  Below you can see the saddle selection online tool they created based on their research. 
  • Ischial Bone Study (sit bone width):  Selle found a wide variation of sit bone widths from their 240 participants and subsequently created 3 saddle widths based on the averages in the study.  The width was measured at the 90 degree spine angle and they created another device (seen above with the teal gel pad) to assign a saddle based on sit bone width.  The most interesting part of this study was this precious gem mentioned in their research, “Ischial (sit bone) distance varies according to riding position due to the v-shape pelvic anatomy.  In the more inclined spine angle, the distance will become shorter as the contact points move from the seat bones toward the pubic bones.”  Result: if you ride with a 90 degree spine angle, then the sit bone measurement may be somewhat accurate (more on this later).  If you ride in any other position(most cyclists) it’s likely that the contact point will move forward away from your sit bones,  which, they do not mention, renders sit bone measurement (in the 90 degree form) for most enthusiast and competitive cyclists completely irrelevant.
  • Gender and Shape Study:  Although this does not connect specifically with sit bone measurement, it does impact our point about spine angle. 66 participants were tested using specific pressure mapping with 64 different sensors at the 30, 45, and 60 degree angle.
    • Selle assumed that the pelvic position on the 60 and 90-degree would have the same result.  This is likely debatable depending on the rider but certainly, individual preference and riding style will impact saddle comfort.  Therefore, when considering an incredibly sensitive decision such as the saddle, why make a conclusion without doing the testing? Selle already invested the money so it would have been helpful to test and rule it out.
    • The differences between male and female average and maximum pressure was minimal at the 60 and 45 degree angle but at the 30 degree angle it was significant, which they concluded was due to the anatomical differences between male and female.  Considering that Selle’s line of the Scientia is based on the upright rider vs. the road, gravel, cross, mountain, tri…etc. rider, they clearly avoided the area where there is significant sensitivity and variance among males and females.  We are not inside the board room of intricate decisions of the Selle Royal juggernaut, but if they found significantly reduced pressure and gender differences at a higher spine angle, it makes sense that they would potentially avoid saddle selection that would disprove the sit bone width method.

How to Find the Right Bike Saddle

Without being redundant (which means this is redundant), it’s clear that unless you are riding upright on your saddle, a sit bone width measurement and saddle selector tool based on that idea is likely irrelevant based on your spine angle, pelvic pressure, gender, and/or riding style. Yet, let’s take this a step further.  There’s no guarantee that a sit bone measurement based on the 90-degree riding position will provide you with a comfortable saddle.  There could be a comfort issue based on the external material of the saddle, the density, the type of foam used, your weight or the clothing you wear (we won’t go into this one here).  Consequently, the only way to truly find your perfect saddle is to personally test the saddle.  Granted it was helpful of Selle to embark on research regarding shape, gender, and body position’s impact on saddle selection but there’s no online bike saddle match or finder that will tell you how it feels.  There’s another company that offers a selection tool based on your flexibility but regardless of how or if you can touch your toes, that doesn’t tell you how the saddle feels after a 60 mile gravel ride.

To continue with the concern about the “sit” measurement, a static measuring process does not assure comfort in a dynamic sport.  How often do you sit on the saddle without pedaling while riding?  For most disciplines, you pedal and pedal often.  As a result, your comfort on the saddle is based on how you feel pedaling vs. the static measure of your seat area.  Even if you were bent in the proper pelvic position to measure pressure, that pressure would likely change based on your pedal stroke.

Here are the BikeFit suggestions to finding the perfect saddle for you:

1.) Test the saddle at your local bike shop or bike fitter.  Most shops carry multiple saddles and if they don’t offer a way for you to test them, turn around and leave.  You’ll need to know first hand how it feels in your specific riding position.  It just so happens (shameless plug) that the mastermind behind BikeFit created a tool to make this process easy and efficient.

If you’re a bike shop reading this, the Saddle Changer streamlines the saddle fitting process and helps a customer test multiple saddles in minutes without the time-sucking process of tightening and removing bolts or fiddling with finicky seat posts.  If you’re a cyclist reading this, how great would it be to test out 20-30 saddles? Many shops use this awesome tool so feel free to ask them when you call, e-mail, or shadily DM about testing new saddles.

2.) Saddle Demo. The Saddle Changer is an amazing tool but riding a saddle for 30 seconds is not the same as an experiencing it for 2 hours.  Yes, you can narrow down the choices with indoor testing but to truly discover the best saddle for you requires taking it for a ride.  Most cyclists move on the saddle while riding as the road or terrain changes and undulates.  As a result, you’ll want to test it in those conditions and in the volume and intensity you experience while regularly riding.  Many shops offer a demo program where you can test a saddle for a certain period of time (usually with a deposit) and there are also some manufacturers who now offer a satisfaction guarantee where if you try the saddle and it’s not for you, you can return it.  This may take much longer so our suggestion is to visit your local dealer or dealers and ask about their saddle testing programs.  Some may even delve into some new technology like adjustable shape and width saddles which provides you with multiple options on a single saddle.

Unfortunately, if you were hoping there was a correlation between measuring sit bone width and simple saddle selection you were wildly let down by this article.  Yet, if you’ve made it this far the truth is revealed.  At the end of the day, the goal is to enjoy cycling and an uncomfortable saddle likely will render that mission futile.  Do you love your saddle?  If you don’t, visit some of your local shops and keep testing until you find the right seat.

-The BikeFit Team (Damon and Paul)

BF Podcast Ep. 3: Paul’s Corner–Saddle Height and Saddle Selection

Part 3 and the final part of our series on saddle height in bike fitting continues with an interview with the founder of BikeFit, Paul Swift. We refer to these regular episodes as “Paul’s Corner” where he not only weighs in on our previous podcast topics but expounds upon what he perceives in the world of cycling and specifically with bike fitting.  

Today’s riveting topics cover the following:

  • The range of saddle height and the variables that affect it.
  • Challenges to setting up proper saddle height.
  • Rider variability
  • The art and science of bike fitting
  • “T-r-i” which is the same as “try” but we were thinking of our triathletes
  • The Saddle Changer’s impact in finding the right saddle.
  • Saddle discomfort
  • Saddle shape and selection
  • Sit bone measurement
  • The BiSaddle
  • and much more…

Paul Swift is an 8-Time US National Track Cycling Champion and a gold medalist at the 1998 Goodwill Games.  After retiring from competitive cycling, Paul founded BikeFit and Bikefit Education to share his passion for cycling. Paul is a Master Bike Fitting Technician, a certified USCF sport coach, and a former member of the USA Cycling Board of Directors. Paul specializes in training bike fitters to correctly deliver comfortable and consistent fits to any type of rider.

Paul is a product designer or creator of the following:

He has trained over 1000 bike fitters and cyclists around the world.  Currently Paul’s Level 1 BikeFit Pro training course is taught in over 12 different counties and in 6 languages.  He is also the co-author of the BikeFit Foot/Pedal Interface manual When the Foot Meets the Pedal…

He continues to innovate in the bike fitting and cycling world with revolutionary ideas and products.  

If you have questions for Paul or interested in taking one of his courses, please contact him via e-mail: [email protected]

BikeFit Education

Episodes You May Like

BF Podcast Ep. 2: The Science of Saddle Height with Dr. Rodrigo Bini

Part 2 of our series on saddle height in bike fitting continues with our episode this week The Science of Saddle Height. Our guest Dr. Rodrigo Bini joins us remotely from Latrobe University in Australia.  

While last week, our guest Tom Wiseman focused on pelvic stability as the indicator of potential saddle height problems, Dr. Bini delves into the research that supports saddle height change.  We talk about some of the following great topics:

  • The amount of saddle height change needed to show statistically significant values in force or oxygen uptake
  • Knee angles
  • Static fitting knee angle vs. dynamic fitting knee angle
  • Should I throw out my Goniometer? Spoiler Alert – No
  • Technology in Fitting
  • Much much more… 

If you missed last week’s episode, you can listen to it here.

Rodrigo Bini, PhD, is a Lecturer and researcher in Exercise and Sports Biomechanics at La Trobe University – Bendigo Campus in Australia.

Currently, Rodrigo is an associate Editor of the Journal of Science and Cycling and the Human Movement journal. He also is a member of the Editorial Board of the Sports Biomechanics Journal, the Journal of Sports Sciences and the European Journal of Sport Science.

Rodrigo is also one of the editors and authors of many chapters in the book Biomechanics of Cycling, published in 2014. Rodrigo has published over 60 articles, the majority involving studies on sports biomechanics and he pursues particular research interests in the application of muscle mechanics principles in sports actions, with special attention to cycling and running.

BF Podcast Ep. 1: Establishing Saddle Height with Tom Wiseman

Saddle height is an often debated topic in cycling and there are multiple methods used to establish it.  Due to the massive amount of information about saddle height, this is our first of 3 episodes delving into this ubiquitous topic.

Professional bike fitter and BikeFit Pro Tom Wiseman of Cycling Solutions joins us for a candid conversation on how, after over 1250 bike fits completed, he establishes saddle height, the definition of pelvic stability, the importance of fit in the process, and identifying factors of improper saddle height.

Full Written Transcript Below

Tom Wiseman initially studied fitting with Michael Sylvester, then at the Serotta International Cycling Institute.  Next, he completed both Level 1 and Level 2 courses with BikeFit, established a mentorship via Curtis Cramblett to achieve his Level 3 status with the International Bike Fitting Institute and also studied special topics in fitting with specialist fitter Happy Freedman.  He is also a Level 2 USA Cycling coach and a fantastic mechanic.  Tom’s business, Cycling Solutions, provides comprehensive bike fitting, coaching, and bike service to the Akron, Ohio area.

Listen to more BikeFit Podcasts

Full Transcript of BikeFit Podcast Episode 1


Tom Wiseman, thank you so much for being on the BikeFit podcast.  I’m excited to have you here today and we’re going to talk about all things saddle fitting.

Tom Wiseman 

Thank you so much, Damon, I appreciate you having me on the show.


To get started, I’d love to hear just a little bit about your background, how you became a fitter.  What is your story?

Tom Wiseman

So I began fitting in 2011.  A good friend of mine had tried to complete the Race Across America and after 2200 miles or so, unfortunately had to withdraw from the race for a variety of reasons, including his position on the bike that was poor.  And at that time as a member of his crew, I wanted so desperately to help him and I had such limited knowledge at that time that I felt like I was doing him a disservice and simply I was present but not active, so I made it a point at that point in my life to say I’ve been in bike industry for 20 years and I know a lot of stuff, but there’s obviously a whole bunch I don’t know and I made it a point that fall and winter to both become a bike fitter and become a USA cycling coach.  And from there on, I really didn’t look back.  I just poured myself into it.  It really excited a whole new passion for cycling for me.  That’s 8 years ago now and I can’t tell you the change it’s been in me as far as my practice is concerned. 


Phenomenal.  How many fits have you done in the last 8 years just to kind of give that background to those listening?

Tom Wiseman

I just recently had to calculate this and count up some things.  As a level 3 International Bike Fit Institute member, you have to accrue 1200 fittings.  I knew I was getting close over the last year, but I didn’t know how close and I had stopped counting for that very reason, but I’m up over 1250 at this point, somewhere in the 1275 range, with this week’s fitting, probably somewhere closer to 1280, so every day it gets a little bit closer.


Well, that’s fantastic because I have a minimum need of a fitter to be on the show to have at least 1200 fits, so you just made the cut off.

Tom Wiseman

Well, thank God for that.


With that experience, I definitely want to get into today’s topic and clearly since you’ve been doing for a while and done so many, I know that you’re the right person to ask about this also because you just did some research on it as well, but let’s get into it, let’s talk about saddle height and let’s go with the function of saddle height.  How do you as a fitter determine saddle height for a cyclist?  What tools do you use? What is your process?

Tom Wiseman

When it comes to saddle height for me, that has evolved some over the past number of years and especially since doing in the past year, I worked with Curtis Cramblett on a mentorship program that focused strictly on saddle height.  And through that process, I really started to focus more on stability of the pelvis as a definitive guide to saddle height.  That’s the primary thing I’m looking for when looking at saddle height.  I mean I also use some other things like flexibility, range of motion, a person’s preference.  You’d be surprised how often that simply plays a role.  They feel like they’re overreaching.  They feel like they’re under-reaching.  And sometimes that mental block or hurdle is difficult to get over, so sometimes we’re doing some coaching as far as teaching them why and how they pedal the way they do and why the saddle influence is that, but I would say primarily what I’m looking at is pelvic stability.


When you’re looking for the pelvic stability, you said the sum of it is you’re working with the cyclists, some of it are you making adjustments to their seatposts based on that stability and how do you see that?  Can you describe that?

Tom Wiseman

Typically, I’m viewing this from the back.  I’m getting better at seeing it from the side, but it’s easier for most people to see it from a rearview of a cyclist.  If you’ve ever ridden in a group ride and you’ve been riding behind somebody, you can tell when a person’s pelvis is unstable either it rocks or rotates over top of the saddle, some people will see it as bobbing in the saddle, so there’s different visual clues that you can see.  But what I usually do is I take a person saddle height up past where they’re stable.  Oftentimes if I’m just shooting in the dark, so to speak, and we’re simply trying to establish a starting point, I’ll take their saddle height up 2 or 3 centimeters or past where they currently are because oftentimes a person’s saddle height isn’t terribly off, sometimes it is of course, but most of the time, it’s at least somewhere where they’re comfortable enough to pedal their bike for the distance that they’ve been covering up to that point, but I usually take it up pretty significantly till they’re obviously unstable and usually a person will immediately say, “Oh my gosh, this is a drastic change and I’m not comfortable here.”  Then we’ll simply start lowering it down until their pelvis calms down and they become more stable on the seat.  Then I make a note to myself that that’s the high point in their saddle stability position.  Sometimes and not often, I will also go to the low end of that range and generally speaking, it’s about 15 millimeters of height that a person can pedal stable and powerful while still remaining comfortable on their bike.


There’s a range, there’s not an absolute.  If you’re talking to someone and they’re like, well, my saddle height needs to be exactly this many centimeters or this many inches, that’s not true as you found.

Tom Wiseman

It’s true for certain people.  Some people have much more adaptability than others.  I have some clients that you move their saddle just a couple of millimeters and they can notice that.  You can have other people, you can move their saddle 2 centimeters and they don’t notice a definitive difference.  It’s the micro adjuster and the macro absorber mentality.  Some people are very sensitive to movement change and some people are simply not, but generally speaking, I think there’s usually a small window of room and height that a person can pedal effectively and comfortably.


Let me go backwards a little bit.  You initially said you went through an evolution to get to this point where you’re looking at pelvic stability, what was your evolution, how did you originally start measuring saddle height and how did you get to where you are now?

Tom Wiseman

I think most fitters start off their experience of learning bike fitting from a formulaic or a systematic approach, so they go to a fit school of some sort and somebody teaches them a method to establish saddle height.  I’m sure in your research recently you found that there’s a whole bunch of different methods from the 1970s on, the Italians had their way of doing things, Andy Pruitt has his way of doing things, Steve Hogg has his way of doing things, I mean there are so many different approaches to how saddle height is determined.  And depending on the person in the application, little bits and pieces of each one of those methods is very effective.  What I learned how to use as far as determining saddle position and saddle height was I started off with a flexibility based and flexibility driven saddle height determination.  I was taught originally by Michael Sylvester who owns a studio up in Portland, Oregon.  He basically teaches that at the bottom of the pedal stroke when the foot is the farthest distance away from the pelvis, you stop the pedal stroke and you rotate the knee back until it’s locked, so you’re looking to stack up the bones of the leg to the pelvis and you want the heel or the calcaneus bone of the foot to be just slightly 1 to 2 centimeters below the first metatarsal head or ball of the foot, at bottom of the pedal stroke.  This when you relax the knee, the knee now has good action at the bottom of the pedal stroke for most people and think middle of the bell curve as far as fitting, this will work really well for a whole bunch of people as long as they don’t have significant issues or have drastically misshapen legs, which we often run into where long femur, short femurs, long feet, there’s a whole bunch of factors that can get you outside of that bell curve.  But generally speaking, that was a great way for me to learn and learn to see how people are or are not stable and that’s how I kind of came to stability as a result of not finding success with that method of establishing saddle height.


I see, so you notice people still being unstable by using that method and thought there has to be some other ways to do this.

Tom Wiseman

Exactly and going to other fitting schools, there are some educators that talk about looking at knee angle as a guide to establishing saddle height 27 to 37 degrees as a general rule of thumb for knee angle to determine a height of the saddle that a person will be effective.  My immediate question to that was, okay, so what determines whether you’re at 27 degrees or whether you’re at 37 degrees?  Because if there is a range like that, what’s going to make you go and drive you to either end of that range?  And I’ve had two big sources of feedback regarding that.  One is on the flexibility front.  If you are more flexible, you can handle a longer knee extension, of course, less flexible, less knee extension.  But what I found is usually a bigger driver for that is simply the stability aspect.  And I found in my experience in the past couple years that many people simply don’t have the flexibility or the foot control to be able to handle a knee angle better than 37, 38 degrees, so oftentimes we’re looking at a knee angle that’s somewhere like 40 degrees and you would think that would be a very low saddle height or what the school taught, but that’s where their pelvis stabilizes, that’s where they have control of their legs, they’re able to spin more smoothly and the pelvis calms down and they can apply power more evenly.


If you focused just specifically on a number, for example, you would see somebody that was potentially unstable and so you would say, “Okay, do I either focus on this number or do I focus on how the individual feels and their response in the way you see them? 

Tom Wiseman

I’m glad you brought that up.  I have concentrated on the number and what I found is that if a person is unstable because they’re hypermobile, so let’s just take for instance, you’ve got a woman that’s a yoga instructor and she is extremely flexible, but when her legs start moving and her pelvis is planted in space on a saddle, she loses control of certain joints as a result of having a great deal of flexibility.  Because she is flexible, you would think, oh, she’ll be at the high end of that range.  But when in reality, she can only control those joints when the range is a little lower and now she can control those muscles through the entire range of motion.  I started looking more at – okay, let’s go to both ends of that spectrum and see where their stability is.  And it was weird that some people you would think that would be at the high end of that were actually at the low end of that as a result of that instability.


Yeah, that’s interesting because I would think counterintuitive.  I would have a different thought of how that would end up than what you actually found.  Realistically…

Tom Wiseman

It was really an eye-opener for me because it was completely counterintuitive and backwards thinking from what I was logically coming to as a result of the research coming up to it.


I think that where it comes in, I’ve heard the term, every individual cyclist needs to be fitted individually, you take them for what they present to you versus this idea of what something tells you they should be. 

Tom Wiseman

Well, I would certainly agree with that.  When I’m talking to people about bike fitting, one of the things that I strongly believe in is if you’re spending an hour a week or more on your bicycle, you can benefit from a bike fitting.  Even the most recreational cyclist often doesn’t think about the long-term effects of a poor position.  They’re like, “Well, I only ride.  You know I go out and ride for an hour a week with my wife and I only cruise around the neighborhood, it’s not that big of a deal.”  Well, an hour can be as much as 5000 pedal strokes and 5000 pedal strokes once a week, every week, that’s a lot of pedal strokes over the course of a year or 5 or 10 and that massive repetition in a poor position will do joint damage.  It’s just that simple.  A lot of people simply don’t think about the fact that your body has to adapt and it can only adapt so much before something gives up, so that injury prevention becomes very important to some people.  When you bring it up in those terms, they’re like, “Oh, I never thought of it that way.” 


In your practice though, do you see people on the end of the spectrum where they’ve already reached that damage phase, I think one thing from a BikeFit end, we encounter a lot of people who are in pain, they’ve reached this point of, “Hey, I used to ride this way for a long time and now this is horrible pain,” which I would assume is thousands and thousands and thousands of pedal strokes and boom, now we can’t do we used to do.  Do you see people across that spectrum or as a lot of the clients you see, hey, I’m in pain, help me? 

Tom Wiseman

I would say the majority of the people that I see are dealing with some sort of pain.  They’re in some type of recovery program from either an injury or surgery or they’re simply not comfortable.  They’ve got saddle pain issues.  They’ve got numb hands.  I mean there’s always a reason one of the questions I ask in my interview processes, everybody comes to me for a reason for a bike fitting, what do you want to get out of your bike fitting today?  What’s your purpose and reason for being here?  Over the years, I’ve gotten a slew of different answers for that as you can imagine, but I would say the majority of times, I’m seeing people that are simply exhausted what they know to do, so they’re looking for an expert to be able to get them onto their bike for a longer period of time at a higher intensity to be able to do what they want to do for the length and duration they want to. 


But you’re also saying that seeing a professional like yourself as a fitter prior to the point where you feel like excruciating pain could potentially help prevent an injury from happening.

Tom Wiseman

And I think that is the truly untapped portion of the cycling market.  Recent studies have shown that only 7% of cyclists are being fitted.  When you think about how many people are actually out there cycling and we’re only doing fittings for 7% of those, that’s a very small piece of pie.  If you think about the number 7%, those 7% are usually people that are injured or unhappy.  There’s a huge portion of the cycling community that can benefit from our services, but simply either one aren’t aware of what we do, aren’t aware of the benefits even if they aren’t in pain and don’t know the long-term ramifications if they don’t come and see us.


Right.  I think that’s you found some of the reasons why we created the BikeFit podcast, but that we digress.  Let’s go backwards and connect, but that was a great moment there to talk about the importance of fitting.  Let’s connect that injury point and injury prevention to this next piece, which is – well, I am a cyclist, I’d like to know from you how do I recognize that I have improper saddle height, you didn’t see it.  If you said you saw it when you’re in a group ride from behind, but that’s an occupational hazard.  You go on a group ride as a fitter, you see all kinds of things, knees, legs, back, I mean I’m sure you see things that drive you crazy.  But if I’m…

Tom Wiseman

Right.  Sometimes I wish I could ride with my eyes shut, sometimes… 


Doesn’t happen, but let’s say individually, I’m a cyclist and I don’t know, right.  I haven’t gone through the schools of thought.  I haven’t gone through this process.  I haven’t done the research.  How do I know my saddle height is incorrect?

Tom Wiseman

This is a great question because most people don’t know what to think of and look for in their own personal body’s awareness of itself in space in order to recognize that their position may not be optimal.  I’ve gotten this question a few times recently and I find that very interesting that you asked it that way.  The main thing that I ask people to think of and look for when they’re riding is simply what is their pedal stroke feel like?  Do they feel like they’re chopping their way along?  Are they simply concentrating on the push phase of the stroke or are they more circles in the aspect of the way they’re pedaling?  Some people describe it as the circle and square, are you pedaling in squares, are you pedaling in circles?  If you feel like your pedal stroke is not smooth, it can be a number of things causing that, but most of the time, saddle height or saddle position in space can be a primary driver for that type of thing, so that’d be the first thing to look for.  The next thing I would think about is when you’re climbing relatively mild hill, 3 to 6 degrees, so you’re pedaling in a slight incline and you’re trying to catch somebody, so you’re putting some power down at a level that on a scale of 1 to 10, I would put somewhere between 7 and 8, so you’re pedaling pretty hard, you’re trying to keep up and when you’re doing that, are your feet comfortable?  Do you feel like you can apply that power for a long duration of time or is it something that you can only do for 15 or 20 seconds before you have to stop and sit up, that would be another indicator because you should be able to apply 7, 8 level power for a good few minutes, think in coaching terms, you should be able to apply power at your VO2 max for somewhere between 3 and 7 minutes.  If you can’t, position can play a very, very important role and not being able to do that especially if you’re a fairly fit cyclist.  Those are the things that I usually tell people to think about and then I always go into the whole conversation, feel free to come in, I’ll make an assessment, we can talk about it.  If a fitting is the right thing for you, we can move forward with that. 


The general answer is there is one, do a couple activities to test that and two is talking about preventive measures, going to a fitter and having somebody see you or having a consultation could obviously help as well.

Tom Wiseman

Oftentimes, I can even talk to somebody over the phone and just through like describing that situation to you in this podcast, I do the same thing in a phone conversation and then 3 days later I get that phone call back from them and they’re like, “Yeah, I did move my seat down, I am more stable, I feel better, I’m smoother, but now I feel like because I’ve moved my seat down, I’m too far forward and I feel cramped.”  Because yes, they move their seat down and because of the angle of the seatpost, their seat is actually moved forward and now they are cramped because that’s just one piece, one contact point of the puzzle, you’re technically holding onto your bike in five places, two feet, two hands and your pelvis and you move one, that affected everything else, so that’s one of the reasons why saddle is very important, but it’s just one piece in this big puzzle. 


A single change as you said could affect multiple factors, so even though you’ve made the change to feel a little bit better, now you’re recognizing something else is different, so it’s helpful to look at this full picture versus just a single change.  I think a lot of people on cycling do the DIY, type in the Google search say how to set my saddle height and then find out well, now my knee hurts even though I changed this, so I feel more stable, but now I’ve got this ancillary problem.

Tom Wiseman

Exactly.  That’s exactly the type of things we’re dealing with is these people, almost anyone and everyone nowadays is going online to find out information.  There’s so much information out there on fitting and the problem is even fitters can’t fit themselves.  I struggled with this after having hip surgery last fall, my position was, one position last spring as a result of having a hip that was messed up.  Then after surgery and recovery, now my position is drastically different, and I had to go get another fitting this spring in order to be able to ride effectively and comfortably this summer.  I tried and I got it better, but when you have a set of eyes that can step back and look at things that I can’t see even with good motion capture equipment, it’s a wonder that fitters don’t have the same problems that everybody else does because there’s not enough good fitters to go see in some towns.


Well, my understanding with fitters was so busy, they actually can’t go out and ride because they’re busy fitting people, so that makes it difficult too.  It’s the hairstylist idea, right?  You’re a master hairstylist, do you cut your own hair?  It’s unlikely.

Tom Wiseman

It’s unlikely.  It’s the cobbler’s son has no shoes.  But I’d like to think that a lot of fitters do get some writing in.  It’s one of the things that makes us very aware of our bodies.  I talked with Happy Freedman about this just recently that one of the things that has allowed him over the years to be the great fitter that he is, is that he’s spent a great deal of his youth and adulthood riding bikes and racing bikes and that awareness that he developed of how you control a bike and why you go into terms the way you do is made him a much better fitter because now he understands that without putting enough weight on the front wheel in order to get that front wheel to dig, you can’t effectively make turns.  And by having a position above the bike that allows you to do that more effectively, suddenly, the fit in that aspect becomes very important.  Without being able to ride and learn that on his own over top of the bike, you would never be able to just see somebody over the top of the bike and say, “Oh, well, that’s what’s going on there,” so I think we learned a lot from actual riding.


You did a paper you talked about you did a mentorship and really dove into saddle height, so the history of saddle height, multiple methodologies from saddle height called the Backside of Bike Fitting Saddle Position, I love the title, what did you find from that?  What was interesting from that, that you’d like to share?

Tom Wiseman

Oh, well, it was very educational.  I can’t stress that enough.  Anytime that even at the very beginning of the paper, I said that any bike fitter worth their salt should be able to establish saddle position.  Most people think oh, saddle position, how hard is it?  You know that’s a great quote from Steve Hogg is, “It can’t be that hard, we should all be able to do it.”  The fact the matter is there’s so many different ways of establishing saddle height that you can get lost.  I mean there’s dozens, literally dozens of methods and some methods are better than others.  Some parts of some methods are better than others.  Some methods don’t work for some people and some other methods work only for some people too.  There’s a great deal of information out there and each method has its merits.  I think that’s the most important thing I learned from the whole experience was that not everybody’s method is the only one, it’s not the end all be all, so to speak.  There are little gems within each style and method and approach that is worth learning about because it’ll change the way you look at a saddle position.  Oftentimes, I belong to several groups and we often talk about you see this picture of a bicycle, you see a picture with somebody on their bicycle and you’re like, oh, their saddle is too high or their saddle is too low.  Well, all you’re getting is a still picture of them on their bike.  You don’t know anything about that person.  You don’t know anything about the kind of riding they do.  You don’t know anything about their medical history.  You don’t have enough information to say whether or not that saddle position is good or bad.  You just know what it is.  To you, it looks god-awful uncomfortable.  But for them, it may be perfect.  That’s one of the things that I really took from this experience was that you can’t just go with a picture.  You’ve got to learn a whole lot more you got to ask the questions.  You got to dive into it and get the information required to make an educated decision and not pull up too soon or make a judgment without the proper background.


Right, which also goes back to this idea of this individual nature, right, what one person sees and says that looks high may not necessarily take into account any of the other factors which makes that person potentially comfortable in that position, let alone it being a static picture. 

Tom Wiseman

Right.  After going through, 12 months of digging and reading and there was some stuff that was not relevant, I dove into all kinds of other things that I didn’t even put into the paper everything from leg-length discrepancies to fore-aft position and knee over pedal spindle.  There are so many things that establish a seat’s position in space where the rider can be that saddle height, just nail it down to saddle height alone was very difficult because there are so many other things that influence it, reach to the handlebars, saddle to handlebar drop, stability of the feet, proprioceptive feedback from the foot.  All of these things can play a role in how a person interacts with their saddle, how much arch support they actually have?  Some people with and without arch support can literally interact with the exact same saddle in the exact same position two completely different ways.  Now with saddle pressure mapping, we’ve proven that and 15 years ago, that information simply wasn’t available.  We’ve evolved in bike fitting with the science that we’ve used to drive it to be able to make definitive decisions on, it’s not all about the saddle, it can be so many other factors.


Well, let’s go into a couple of those because I want to talk about this idea that people are looking at this DIY method to find something online to figure it out.  A couple of methods, which you talked about and I’ve seen are, one where it’s like the heel drop which you talked about earlier or just a formulaic, right, starting with adding a formula and multiplying it by a variable like Greg LeMond had a formula where you’re multiplying your leg length by a certain amount.  Do those get a good starting position for someone in your experience or is that a place where someone shouldn’t start if they’re just setting up on their own before they’ve contacted a fitter, which they should do?

Tom Wiseman

Well, I think a lot of people use those type of methods in order to find a great starting point, even fitters do, so for instance, when I’m putting somebody on the sizing bike and I don’t have their previous bike as an example to take a measurement from it in order to establish saddle height, I’ll take a measurement of their inseam and multiply that by 0.883, the Greg LeMond method and I’ll establish a saddle position.  It’s a good starting point.  It at least gets some pedaling and it’s not so drastically far off that, oh my god, it’s terrible at least most of the time.  Sometimes you may find that even right out of the gate, they’re not stable at that position and I’m not one of those fitters that just leave them there.  I’m one of these.  I’m a strange fitter in this aspect.  I take care of the big things first.  If I see that the reach is too far or the saddle height is too great or too less, not enough, suddenly that that is a significant driving issue into what’s going on in the fit.  I’ll work on that to start with, even though I know I might want to start at the foot and work up.  If that’s not the primary issue that’s having a problem at this moment, that’s not where I’m going to start.  If they’re having trouble breathing, I may start up with the handlebars and get a handlebar position established so that they can relax their upper torso, their pelvis will relax.  Next thing I know, suddenly their feet don’t have a problem anymore, even though the foot was the primary thing they were complaining about.  It’s a matter of identifying what the drivers are and then moving through those things in order to make progress as you go.


You find that in your process, because one of my questions was how much time you spend on it, saddle height specifically, but you find you’re kind of looking for what is the major problem first, so it doesn’t necessarily mean that you look at saddle height or the foot first?

Tom Wiseman

Correct.  I like to describe it in terms of a person that’s fixing a hole in a wall.  You got a wall in your house.  It’s a beautiful piece of drywall and it’s got a bunch of holes in it, some holes are bigger than others.  Let’s just say for instance, you go through and you fix all the big holes, suddenly the small holes don’t look so bad, but once you get all those holes fixed, some of those small holes may become the big holes and then you have to dive into those.  But oftentimes, I can find that in the course of a fitting, I take care of some of these real big issues and some of those small underlying driving issues that the person complained about go away as a result of fixing the big issues, so take care of the big stuff, oftentimes the small stuff takes care of itself.  If it doesn’t, you just keep driving down through them until the person can ride at the duration and the intensity they want to for whatever they’re trying to achieve.


Can a person’s saddle height, a person you’ve seen or let’s just say generally change over time?  Like in other words, there’s this idea maybe that okay, I set this and now I’ve got three different kinds of bikes and they’re all going to have the exact same saddle height because this is my height, but could that change for somebody?

Tom Wiseman

Well, saddle height is different for a number of reasons.  One of the things I didn’t include in my paper for the mentorship was I collected data on people’s height at the beginning of the day and at the end of the day, so I took five people, I took measurements of their height and I found that some people would vary as much as three and a half centimeters in height over the course of a single day, pretty dramatic.  Well, then as a matter of talking to people, Happy Freedman says, “Well, now you’re measuring saddle height measure for the navicular drop.”  The navicular is a bone in the arch of the foot that often collapses as a result of instability in the foot over the course of the day.  Naturally I’m like, okay, well, I’ll start measuring foot next thing I know, I’m finding out that some people in my group of people that I’m taking measurements for, their arch collapses during the day instead of their spine compressing during the day.  It’s a matter of where does that height change and how will that affect their position on the bike?  If a spine compresses, the reach might change.  If the foot collapses, the saddle height might change.  Do they do the riding and racing in the afternoon?  Do they do it in the morning?  Will that affect saddle height?  You most definitely consider it will.  That’s one aspect of it.  Another thing is those three different bikes may all be for different disciplines.  If you’ve got somebody that’s racing cyclocross, most likely they’re going to be getting on and off of that bike, great deal, their saddle height might be a little bit lower in order to more easily facilitate jumping on and off of it.  If you’ve got somebody that’s a crit racer, that saddle height might be a little bit higher.  For some people, it might actually be significantly lower because this is a person that’s mobile over top of that bike and they’re simply sliding all over that saddle.  I want them to be using that entire thing.  If they can’t, then that limits what they can do going in and out of turns, accelerating and decelerating and cornering at high speed.  I would say absolutely, the saddle position may change and that doesn’t even include injuries, other factors that may play a role in how saddle height might change over time.


Yeah, I wondered if age had something to do with it, if even aging affected saddle height, let’s say it’s set correctly for this specific discipline for the needs you have as a cyclist, okay, this is what I do, I want to do this Gran Fondo, but if age has a factor in changing that.

Tom Wiseman

I think age on its own is not a factor, but I think other things that may be related to age can play a factor like spinal compression and like arch drop, even pelvic rotation, so if you think about when the pelvis is on the saddle and if you’re in a fairly upright position and your pelvis is rotated back or posterior rotated, the hip joint is in a certain position and if you rotate that pelvis forward, you get into a more aero position, the pelvis rotates forward in that joint changes position and the position may not be as comfortable because that joint’s in a different position in essence making the leg longer.  If that’s the case, then a saddle position may need to change based on what position they’re riding in.  If they’re doing long Gran Fondo type rides and they’re sitting more upright, that saddle height might be different comparatively to if they’re doing very aggressive riding and their pelvis is very posterior/anterior rotated, rotated forward, their position maybe much more aggressive.


Right, like a triathlete, right?  The amount that your hips are rotated at that position, how that would affect them? 

Tom Wiseman

Yeah and that’s a whole another animal altogether.  They’re usually very up and forward and much more anterior rotated, so they rotate much farther forward.  They’re seated on a portion of the pelvis that is very far forward.  The pubic rami or something that, most people have trouble sitting on to begin with and that position, I found that there are some people that they want to ride there, but they can’t ride there comfortably especially for long distances, so it becomes a big challenge in saddle position and saddle choice at that point, finding something that is the best of both worlds and able to allow them to ride for that duration and intensity that they want to cover. 


I got to go backwards.  I got to go back to this thing that you just mentioned previously talking about your height changing throughout the day.  Your height changes throughout the day between your spine and your arch and those two places and when you fit someone, you’re doing a snapshot in time, how do you accommodate for that kind of difference, especially since it varies by the individual?

Tom Wiseman

One of the phrases that I love in bike fitting is that a bike fitting is simply your position at this moment on this bike. That may change 2 weeks from now, that may change 2 months from now, it depends on so many factors will influence how and why you sit the way you do that my establishment of position in during this 2-hour or 3-hour bike fitting is only this snapshot in time.  Some people are adaptable more than others.  I can change your bike significantly in a short period of time.  I can change a person’s body significantly over a longer period of time, but they have to be a willing participant in making those changes.  Oftentimes, I’m literally working with that person for weeks afterwards in order to increase their flexibility in their weak areas, increase strength in their weak areas, sometimes changing the way they pedal, so that their interaction with the bike is more efficient because they simply have developed so many bad habits over the past few years that we’re trying to break them in order to increase their efficiency, so those things as far as like their position changing because of their height changing on a daily basis, I’m looking for a neutral saddle position when I think of that 15-millimeter space in the air where that saddle is going to be in above their crankset that position, I’m trying to find the closest to the center of that and it may drop so say for instance, oh, I’ve got a big MS 150 ride coming up this week and a lot of recreational riders do 75 miles up and 75 miles back the next day.  I suggest for some people if you go really hard, you do the hundred miles on the first day and you wake up in the tomorrow morning and you’re sore and you’re having trouble walking down the stairs to get your bike, you may want to consider dropping your saddle height a centimeter to get started with your ride because all the muscles of the lower extremities are tight and that tightness is going to limit your interaction with the bike.  And by lowering the saddle, you’re making the muscles contraction smaller, shorter, making things a little more comfortable until you warm up, then maybe at 20-25 miles, you stopped, you put your saddle height 5 millimeters, you ride the rest of the ride.  These are things that many people just don’t even think about.  It’s not something that’s considered.  Let alone be able to consider it and accept the fact that a bike fitter is going to be able to convey that in an understandable fashion during the course of a 3-hour bike fitting. 


It sounds like you’re fitting level, what you’re doing, what you’re providing for people is more than just the snapshot and even the neutral of the day.  You have an ongoing relationship, you are helping them to meet their needs of what they do, but also you’re almost coaching them, I would say in a sense from just being a bike fitter to the knowledge of the general person, every cyclist is just I go in and get my bike setup, but it sounds like your relationship goes much beyond that.

Tom Wiseman

Well, as a USA cycling coach, I pride myself in applying what’s necessary for that person for them to achieve their goals.  Even in my company name, Cycling Solutions, my whole premise is that I want to guide that person to their goals in whatever cycling they’re trying to achieve and that’s different for everybody.  Even my coaching approach is very individualized from the person that’s looking to just improve their fitness to the person that’s trying to be a crit racer to the person that’s trying to Race Across America, we go into why and what they’re trying to do and what things we can do as a team in order to make that goal more achievable for them, so it’s very individualized, absolutely.


But they connect, right?  It sounds like your practice as a coach even affects as part of the way you fit, even if it’s not an athlete of yours, it sounds like you treat fit like that process or maybe that’s your personal philosophy that you believe fit is this ongoing, not only am I adjusting you to the bike, but I’m going to train you in how to ride.

Tom Wiseman

I believe that’s correct.  My approach is never a one-and-done type of situation and I stress that very heavily during the fit process is that if what I apply to you and what we try to do with your bike today will work for some people, but not necessarily for others and your adaptability may not allow you to be happy on this position that we’ve established today once you get out and you put 35 miles on it.  If that’s the case, I would rather have the opportunity to get you back on the stand whether it be 2 or 3 times whatever it takes in order for you to be happy than for you to be disappointed at all.  The key is that I don’t learn anything as a bike fitter unless somebody tells me I’ve done something wrong.  If I try something and it’s ineffective, I want to know about it because I want to know that if it didn’t work and I want to be able to try something different in order to find out what does work for you.  That allows me to think of things to apply, they’re not necessarily inside the box methods.  This goes back to my belief that formulaic or methodized fitting is not necessarily the best approach for most people because the fact is there are so many things that make us individuals that we simply have to look at things that are outside of the norm to apply to a solution in order to get a person to be happy on their bike.  If you weren’t willing to go the steps necessary in order to find out what those things are, you have an unhappy person at the end of the day.  Frankly, my goal is I got people paying me for bike fittings, I want them to be happy, I want them to come back, I want them to tell their friends, I want them to tell everyone they know that’s unhappy on their bike that, “Hey, Tom took care of me, Tom got me happy, I would say go see him, he’ll take good care of you.”


It also helps from the business name, right, Cycling Solutions sounds a lot better than Cycling Formulaic Methods that might work.

Tom Wiseman

Absolutely, I would agree.  That’s awesome.


Tom, I cannot thank you enough for being on the BikeFit podcast.  We appreciate your insight and I can’t wait to talk to you again about another topic.

Tom Wiseman

Well, thanks for having me and it was a great time and I look forward to the next subject.

Listen to more BikeFit Podcasts

What to Expect in a Bike Fit

The expectations of a bike fit can vary depending on what you need and where you are fitted.  BikeFit breaks down the definition of bike fitting and some realistic expectations for a quality fit.

The short answer to the title in this article: It depends.  It’s impossible to place an “all-encompassing” practice such as bike fitting and apply it to the plethora of cycling disciplines and types of activities on a bike.  That would be equivalent of seeing 1 doctor for every possible ailment.  Beyond the general practitioner, there’s a specialist for almost every condition.  Bike fitters also range in their experience, tools used, education and process.  Therefore, what you should expect will vary but our mission is to help you find the individualized fit you need and to identify the most important elements.  Although anyone can offer bike fitting, it may not necessarily meet your goals.

What is a Bike Fit? 

1.) Adjusting the bicycle to fit the individual needs of the cyclist.  

2.) Educating and aiding the cyclist to function best on their bicycle.

For this article, we are going to focus on part 1.  The second part delves into the world of bike fitters, physical therapists, and coaches who provide riders with ways to improve strength, pedaling technique, flexibility, breathing, and other rider-specific exercises.  This is certainly not saying that you didn’t receive a full fit if these missing from your fit session, but there are different types of fitters and finding one that meets your needs is imperative.  

Let’s begin with the basic understanding of the definition of a bike fit: adjusting the bicycle to fit you.  Other times we’ve defined this as customizing a symmetrical bicycle to an asymmetrical body.  I hope no one is shocked by this nugget of truth but even the ridiculously beautiful people of the world whose eyes are perfectly spaced could have high arches, two different sized feet, or a leg length discrepancy. To take this a step further, we contacted renowned bike fit professional Jessica Bratus of Bike FitMi in Ann Arbor, MI to glean her definition of a bike fit, “It is a process in which every contact point of the bicycle, as well as the macro relationships between contact points, are optimized for that particular body.”  Since we are seriously nailing this point home, the fit is about you, the individual, and your unique body (height, weight, flexibility, physical activity, injury, asymeetry…etc.).   

Fitting Goals

Since we’ve established the individual and subjective nature of fit, it is imperative that before you seek out a fitter, you ask yourself 2 questions:

1.) What results do I want from a bike fit?

This will likely be synonymous with your goals.  Most of these results fall into 2 categories: eliminate/reduce pain or increase performance.  Here are a few examples:

  • Solve my issue with recurring pain on the back of my knees after each ride.
  • Reduce hand numbness that occurs after a few miles.
  • Find a position that will help increase aerodynamics for my next triathlon.
  • Optimize position for best power expenditure while racing.

There are a plethora of results you may desire but the important part of this puzzle is to recognize that a fitter is not a miracle worker.  As a rider, we have to manage our expectations of the fit outcome.  Many fitters provide an excellent experience but they are not going to change you from a beginning rider to a world-class athlete.  

2.) What type of riding or rides will I do in the future?

This is where the “need” or goal of the individual plays an important role in the fit process.  To understand what we mean by “need”, think of the results or goals you want to attain combine it with your type of riding.  Here are a few examples:

  • Gran Fondo
  • Local time trial
  • Club rides every weekend
  • Charity rides like Bike MS
  • Triathlon
  • Commuting to work
  • MTB (downhill, enduro, xc…etc.)
  • Gravel Riding
  • Racing (any discipline)
  • Fat Bike Adventures
  • BMX

Within these examples, there may be some variability of your needs based on the distance, the amount you’ll ride, and competitively, your expectations.  For example, it’s one goal to finish a Gran Fondo and another to be competitive in the top times in your age group.  It’s also noteworthy to mention that the more time you spend on the bike will dictate how much more important a quality, comprehensive fit will help you.  Pain is intensified by duration.  If your aspirations are much simpler like riding at the beach once in a while, you may benefit from proper setup but the full fit experience will be focused on your intensity, duration, and type of riding. 

Bike Fitting vs. Bike Sizing

Now that you’ve established what you want from a fit, let’s explore some common misnomers in fitting.  Bike fitting is an odd and confusing concept in cycling, but it’s even more profound compared to other products and industries using the term “fit.”  What does it mean to find the right fitting shoes, pants, dress, hat…etc.?  If I take the following measurements of my body, this particular article of clothing will supposedly fit (unless you’re a body builder, speed skater, sprinter or track cyclist).  To apply this same sizing logic to cycling:  we assume that if you are a certain height and have a specific inseam, this amazing new bike is going to “fit.”  There are even some systems in bike shops where the body is scanned or medieval torture instruments are used to take measurements which in turn place you on the “perfect fitting bike.”  It may be the correct size, but it’s unlikely that it will “fit” based on the definition we described previously without adjustments or corrections.  Consequently, it’s important to understand the definition because the terms bike fitting and bike sizing are often confused even by professionals and bike shops.  

Without going into excessive detail on the differences between them (we delve into this in another article), bike sizing happens prior to purchasing a bike. The process involves taking measurements of an individual and applying those specific measurements to match a person to the correctly sized bike frame.  Most competent fitters will perform both bike sizing and bike fitting and will understand the relationship between the two.

The Main Components of a Bike Fit

Although there may be a few other processes that some fitters use, most professional bike fits will have the following: An interview, an assessment, adjustments of the 3 main contact points, testing, and a report.

Pre-Fit Interview

Before you sign up for your first fit, we strongly recommend contacting a fitter to discuss your goals and type of riding.  It’s possible that you’re a mountain biker and the fitter you contacted has only worked with road and triathlon bikes.  If that’s the case, it may not be a good fit.  This is also significant if you have an injury (recent or past) that may need the attention of a physical therapy-based fitter.  A quality fitter will tell you about their experience level, whether they’ve helped cyclists attain similar goals, or will inform you if this is outside of their general practice.  If that’s the case, they should refer you to another local professional with the experience to best serve you.

The Interview

Assuming you’ve found the right match, a knowledgeable fitter will interview you either prior or during the fit to glean as much relevant information as possible.  Here are some examples of what they may ask:

  • Goals or objectives for the fit
  • Cycling goals
  • Current type of riding (how much and how often)
  • Injury history including current issues
  • Medical conditions
  • Areas of discomfort
  • Previous fitting information (have you had a fit prior to address the concerns)

There are fitters who may ask more detailed or follow up questions based on their training and comfort.  These are some of the basic ones that every fitter should ask.


This varies significantly across the spectrum from fitter to fitter.  If you receive a fit from a medical professional fitter, they will likely perform an off-bike structural assessment or flexibility assessment as part of the fit.  This is not a requirement of a bike fit.  Unfortunately, there are many fitters who are not qualified to assess your flexibility by grabbing your leg and checking its range of motion.  If a fitter does incorporate off-bike assessments, they should explain to you the purpose and how it affects the fit.  The qualified ones will be forthcoming and assure you are completely comfortable during the process.  If you’re not, inform them immediately.

For those who do not perform an off-bike physical assessment, they will likely start their assessment process by observing your pedaling motion and body movement during the warm-up phase of the fit. 

Adjustment: Fitting Should Focus on the 3 Contact Points

The founder of BikeFit, Paul Swift, popularized the term, “making the bike disappear.”  The idea that you are literally in space fully functioning in whatever activity or event that’s occurring and the only resistance you encounter is the wind, the mountain, the rocks, your muscles screaming or on a rare occasion, an ostrich chase.  Unfortunately for many riders, you are keenly aware of the presence of your bike including discomfort or pain in the three contact points: feet, hands, and rear end.  

Regardless of your goal, style of riding, or reason for getting a fit, you can expect a competent fitter will aptly examine and potentially adjust all 3 main contact points.  We’ll argue that even a fit for a flat pedal (as opposed to clipless pedals), while it may require less attention, should still properly examine and correct at the feet.  As Jessica mentioned earlier, every fit should focus on these contact points and the relationship between them.  Unfortunately, there are countless stories of riders who invested significantly into professional fits that ignored one of these three areas or only barely scraped the surface.  Although we won’t to delve into the extent of how each area should be examined in this article, you should expect a fitter to be equipped with the knowledge and tools to adjust all points thoroughly.  When this doesn’t happen, you get a case like one of our customers:

Mark set a goal to complete in a 170 mile,  3-day ride across Florida.  Unfortunately, after every ride, he experienced significant knee pain–the longer the ride, the worse the pain.  Mark went to 5 different bike fitters in 7 years and although they examined him using some state of the art equipment and 3d motion capturing, they failed to fully examine the foot/pedal interface and offer solutions that could have reduced his pain.  In the end, he ended up solving the issue by visiting a BikeFit Pro who extensively focused on his feet and fitting him for Cleat Wedges.

Although this may be an extreme example, if a fitter does not spend ample time on each contact point, you did not receive a full fit.  In our experience, it seems that the feet are the contact point that is ignored most often, although arguably it’s the most important.  For most riders, you can ride without your hands on the handlebar or you can ride out of the saddle but the contact point that’s always connected is the feet, except if you attempting to superman on the bike.  BikeFit’s legal team advises that no one should attempt to superman on their bike.


As we mentioned before, a fitter is not a miracle worker and small changes can make great differences but not necessarily immediate.  It’s important that after the accommodations and changes are complete, you test out this new position outside of the environment of the fit studio.  Usually, you aren’t fit while climbing hills, descending treacherous trails, or pushing for your best 1 hour time.  Consequently, the changes made by the fitter may feel odd at first .  That doesn’t mean the fit was a failure but the body, in some cases, takes time to adapt.  For some individual, the benefits are immediately apparent, especially for those who previously experienced pain.  Some fits allow a cyclist to ride more efficiently over the same distance at a lower heart rate, since they are not using their joints an muscles to stabilize the bike but rather they’ve become 1 hybrid of bicycle and human: a buman or a hike (buman is much better).  Most fitters will offer you the opportunity to return within a realistic period of time to reassess if you are experiencing anything negative, lingering effects from the fit.  If a fitter doesn’t offer this service, they are putting their business in jeopardy.

Reporting or Measurement Sharing

Throughout the fit, professional fitters have different methods of note-taking to document the bike and body changes.  This is a crucial part of the fit and information that, in our opinion, must be provided to the cyclist at the conclusion of the session.  Some fitters will use a program that creates a report like the BikeFit Pro App.  

Other fitters may use a word document, a full readout of numbers and measurements from a fit bike, or pen and paper.  There isn’t a “right or wrong” way to provide you with measurements but is it wrong if they are not supplied at the conclusion of the fit.

Post Fit

While the goal of the fit is to provide the cyclist with their desired results, sometimes this is not the case.  If for some reason your fit does not help you meet your original goals, we always recommend going back to the fitter to inform them that there is an issue.  Just like any other product or service, you would return if the results were not what you expected.  If you visit the doctor initially and your symptoms persist, you’re going to call the doctor back.  Professional bike fitter Tom Wiseman of Cycling Solutions mentioned in an interview recently, “I want customers to come back to me if they are not satisfied.  The only way to learn how to solve the problem is to know there is one.”  Jerry Gerlich, a professional fitter from Castle Hill Fitness, guarantees his work, “Everyone is a different ball of wax and if you guarantee your work, that really gets you to focus on what’s going on to solve the problem.”  Although it’s difficult lesson, it goes to show that if you are in some way unsatisfied or especially still in pain, you should return to your fitter.

Final Fitting Thoughts

Although it’s part of the expectations, we did not go into detail on the techniques, tools, technology or specific biomechanics of a fit.  The reason is that this varies widely from fitter to fitter and the main aspects of every fit should be the same.  Unfortunately, that is not always the case.  Happy Freedman, Professional Fitter from the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York says, “Not all fitters are created equal but a great fitter will adjust to your needs.”  This is true of any profession in the world where, for example, there are great teachers and there are not-so-great teachers but experience does not always correlate with excellence.  The second part of Happy’s statement is the one that’s the most important.  Is the fitter attempting to meet your goals and needs or trying to force you into a position dictated by a machine?  This isn’t technology slander, since we use it daily as part of our fitting and fit training, but we don’t rely on it solely.   

Paul Swift described it like this, “The less you know about bike fitting, the more you look at a number to dictate the fit.  The more you know and look at bike fitting, the more you look at the overall picture.”

Our advice: contact the fitter and ask them about the expectations delineated in this blog, explain your goals to them, learn about their experience and process, find out if they’ve solved problems or attained goals for cyclists with similar ambitions, and how they address the main contact points.  If you want to know what to expect in a bike fit, ask a competent fitter.

New BikeFit Distribution: Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia

Kirkland, WA—May 16th, 2019—BikeFit is proud to introduce our newest distributor, PROSPORT.LT, who will provide BikeFit products and tools in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Poland.

“PROSPORT.LT is a world leader in sporting goods distribution,” said general manager Jonas Strom.  “We started our business to meet the needs of every fan of tennis, skiing, cycling and a healthy lifestyle.”

PROSPORT.LT is recognized for carrying the following brands:

Tennis: Wilson, Tecnifibre, Lotto, and Luxilon.

Bicycles: Bianchi, Scott, Brompton, Frog, Conway, Classic, Kona, Atala, Bergamont, Victoria, and Whistle.

Skiing: Atomic, Bolle, Dainese, Bogner, Lenz, and Snowlife.

Sports Watches: Suunto and Garmin.

PROSPORT.LT was founded in 2009 and is celebrating its 10th successful year in business. The team is a qualified and enthusiastic group of sports consultants who will help select the best products for every person’s favorite sporting activity or active leisure.

The mission of PROSPORT.LT is to provide sports enthusiasts with the most appropriate and effective equipment. Our goal is consumer confidence and leadership in Lithuania.

PROSPORT.LT – Passion for Sport!”

“Our goal is to help every cyclist experience pain-free performance regardless of the cycling disicpline,” said BikeFit Operations Manager Damon Wyatt.  “PROSPORT.LT supports our mission and helps us expand our mission into countries less familiar with our line of ride-improving products and tools.”

PROSPORT.LT will be shipping products to Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Poland.  Please contact Jonas for details or questions on how to become a BikeFit dealer in those countries.

BikeFit Distribution in Argentina

Kirkland, WA—March 25, 2019—BikeFit is proud to announce our partnership with SUD Outdoors to distribute BikeFit products in Argentina.

SUD Outdoors is a rapidly growing, multi-faceted company that also will distribute Respirfix and Elit Bicycles.  They represent and distribute premium brands specializing in outdoor activities such as cycling, snow sports, trail running, and sport fishing; offering leading, innovative and high-quality products.  They offer passionate people the best brands and products with well-deserved service.

“We’re excited about the opportunity to expand our product distribution into South America,” said BikeFit Operations Manager Damon Wyatt.  “Cycling popularity there is at an all-time high so the need to customize the riding experience through bike fitting products is paramount.”

SUD Outdoors will ship products into multiple countries of South America including Chile, Uraguay, and Paraguay.

BikeFit’s expanse into South America means that our products are now available from our international distributors on 5 different continents.

The New Shape of Comfort: 1 and 2 Degree Cleat Wedges for SPD and 2-Hole Cleats

 What is the shape of comfort? BikeFit examines each one of our products to assure that cyclists achieve the most comfortable ride.  With that goal in mind, we often review our products to see if we can improve upon a great idea.  

In 2018 we updated many of our plastics with a stronger more durable compound and we updated the shape of our popular Look/Shimano Cleat Wedges.

For 2019, our SPD / Mountain Bike 2-hole wedges received a signifcant makeover.  


Previous Version


  • Better fit with the most popular brands of 2-hole cleats on the market
  • Stronger more durable material (withstands the rigors of anything you throw at it)
  • Conforms to the sole of any cycling shoe
  • Allows foot to pedal in a neutral position (inherent tilt)

2 Degrees of Separation

Due to the popularity of the Look 2-Degree Cleat Wedge, we’ve also released a 2-degree version of our SPD/MTN Cleat Wedge as well.  This thicker version of the wedge allows bike fitters the ability to fine-tune fits without fumbling with multiple 1-degree wedges.  Currently, the 2-degree SPD/MTB wedges are only available for dealers and wholesalers with a wholesale account, but we may expand that market based on the demands of cycling enthusiasts.

Pin It on Pinterest